Saturday, September 17, 2005

Bill Maher's Open Letter to G.W.

Bill Maher, on his HBO show, had a pretty funny open letter to George Bush:
- Mr. President, this job can't be fun for you any more. There's no more money to spend--you used up all of that. You can't start another war because you used up the army. And now, darn the luck, the rest of your term has become the Bush family nightmare: helping poor people.

Listen to your Mom. The cupboard's bare, the credit cards maxed out. No one's speaking to you. Mission accomplished. Now it's time to do what you've always done best: lose interest and walk away.

Like you did with your military service and the oil company and the baseball team. It's time. Time to move on and try the next fantasy job. How about cowboy or space man?

Now I know what you're saying: there's so many other things that you as President could involve yourself in. Please don't.

I know, I know. There's a lot left to do. There's a war with Venezuela. Eliminating the sales tax on yachts. Turning the space program over to the church. And Social Security to Fannie Mae. Giving embryos the vote.

But, Sir, none of that is going to happen now. Why? Because you govern like Billy Joel drives. You've performed so poorly I'm surprised that you haven't given yourself a medal. You're a catastrophe that walks like a man. Herbert Hoover was a shitty president, but even he never conceded an entire city to rising water and snakes.

On your watch, we've lost almost all of our allies, the surplus, four airliners, two trade centers, a piece of the Pentagon and the City of New Orleans. Maybe you're just not lucky.

I'm not saying you don't love this country. I'm just wondering how much worse it could be if you were on the other side. So, yes, God does speak to you.

What he is saying is: "Take a hint." -




Maher also had a pretty funny take on the Intelligent Design "debate":
- And finally New Rule: You don't have to teach both sides of a debate, if one side is a load of crap.

Now, Presiden
t Bush recently suggested that public schools should teach intelligent design, alongside the theory of evolution. Because, after all, evolution is quote, "just a theory." Then the President renewed his vow to drive the terrorists straight over the edge of the earth.

Now, here is what I don't get. President Bush is a brilliant scientist. He's the man who proved you can mix two parts booze with one part cocaine, and still fly a jet fighter. And yet... yet he just can't seem to accept that we descended from apes.

It just seems pathetic to be so insecure about your biological superiority, to a group of feces-flinging, rouge-buttocked monkeys, that you have to make up fairy tales. Like we came from Adam and Eve, and then cover stories for Adam and Eve like, intelligent design. Yeah, leaving the Earth in the hands of two naked teenagers. That's a real intelligent design.

I'm sorry, folks, but it may very well may be that life is just a series of random events. And that there is no... master plan. But enough about Iraq. Let me instead restate my thesis. There aren't necessarily two sides to every issue. If there were, the Republicans would have an opposition party.

And an opposition party would point out that even though there's a debate, in schools, and government, about this, there is no debate among scientists. Evolution... is supported by the entire scientific community. Intelligent design is supported by guys online to see "The Dukes of Hazzard."

And the reason there is no real debate, is that intelligent design isn't real science. It's the equivalent of saying that the thermos keeps hot things hot and cold things cold, because it's a god. It's so willfully ignorant you might as well worship the U.S. Mail. It came again! Praise, Jesus!

No, stupidity isn't a form of knowing things. Thunder is high pressure air meeting low pressure air. It's not God bowling. Babies come from storks is not a competing school of thought... in medical school. We shouldn't teach both. The media shouldn't equate both. If Thomas Jefferson...

If Thomas Jefferson knew we were blurring the line this much between church and state, he would turn over in his slave. Now as for me, I believe in evolution and intelligent design. I think God designed us in his image, but I also think God is a monkey! God bless you and goodnight! -

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

intelligent design is such crap

plz don't waist blog-space on that

September 17, 2005 12:56 PM  
Blogger Eric said...

Yikes...until intelligent design can be beyond "God in the gaps" speculation, it doesn't deserve the slot to be taught in schools. How about allowing other cultural and scientific theories of creation and of life? Say phrenology, geocentrism, and astrology? I mean, the latter is Greek! A backbone of Western culture! Would the Pat "Take him out" Robertson Right be up for that?

September 17, 2005 2:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can't understand why any self-respecting orthodox Christian would be a creationist. Seriously, the aversion to common descent positively smacks of Docetism. And Biblical literalism is a modern perversion. C.S. Lewis (in Miracles) and Augustine's writings on Genesis are required reading here.

Here's a telling post from a friend of mine, a curate in the Church of England.

September 17, 2005 4:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i believe it is spelled "waste" not "waist"

what aspect of evolution do certain christians reject? is it the whole concept or just the first mover?

also, what is intolerant about mocking intelligent design?

September 18, 2005 12:25 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow..a lot of noise over a comic post. Why can't we all get along >|

-Victoria

September 18, 2005 9:16 AM  
Blogger arun said...

Raghav - I'd wager that you are more read in Christian theology, history, philosophy (and peripheral works of literature) than most even orthodox Christians in America. The exceptions are probably your very very well read friends, but I'd wager the avg-joe christian in America hasn't read much Augustine. So, yes, though Biblical literalism (and a lot of Abrahamic literalism at that) is more of a modern perversion - and we have discussed this at length - I think it is difficult to hold a lot of people to these standards.

September 18, 2005 9:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can't understand why any self-respecting orthodox Christian wouldn't be a creationist. Seriously, the aversion to God positively smacks of ignorance. C.S. Lewis (in Miracles) and Augustine's writings are required reading here.

September 19, 2005 9:34 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You forgot the third and fifth sentences.

September 19, 2005 10:20 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bush is right, we should teach every side to the story. Infact, I propose a third theory, afterall if every "theory" is to be taught, I propose the flying spaghetti monsterism. Here:

http://www.venganza.org/index.htm

Fact is evolution is taught in biology because its part of the science. you can teach it and it can be used as science. intelligent design isn't like that. you can't 'use' intelligent design the way you'd use biological evolution to say, perform heart surgery. that's why its not taught in schools

September 22, 2005 12:19 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home